Monday, October 29, 2007

Local Funding

Since the adoption of Proposal A in march of 1994, our community has not had much direct control of our school funding. The idea had been to provide more equitable funding for all students in the state as well as to relieve property taxes. What has happened is some districts, especially in the Detroit suburbs, receive up to 85% more money per pupil than those districts (like TCAPS) receiving the minimum foundation grant. Last year Traverse City received $7,085 per student while Bloomfield Hills was given $12,220 and Birmingham $12,140. I appreciate the efforts of TCAPS staff members to help organize Citizens for Equity, a group that has done much to promote awareness of inequity in both Lansing and communities statewide. Unfortunately, it will take years to effect real change at the State level and our schools need money immediately.

While our executive team at Administration has lamented over and over the state funding issue and has now co-opted the Citizens for Equity group, I have yet to hear any solutions from them. I was taught that endlessly complaining about a problem doesn't get anyone very far, but ideas for change do. That is why I am organizing an educational foundation to support TCAPS.

By creating an educational foundation and establishing an endowment, we could control school funding locally and provide a funding mechanism independent of the State. I have researched the huge endowment funds at Yale and Harvard ($22-30 billion) as well as the much more modest foundations that spend nearly what they bring in every year, which at many programs is between $50,000 and $150,000. The common element is the ability of the fund to provide monetary support for its beneficiary institution. The endowment structure is what I am interested in, with the idea of investing the donations and spending a portion of the interest each year while the principal continues to grow. Most endowments at schools across the country spend between 4% and 6% of the endowment balance each year, allowing that fund to grow from interest on principal as well as new donations. This way there will be more money to spend in 5, 10, 15 years than there is now.

Some of the uses for the funds could be: elementary foreign language, curriculum development and support, staff professional development, new textbooks, enrichment classes and opportunities, and really anything the school district can't or won't find the money for.

In order to establish the endowment and get it going, there would need to be fundraising obviously, and quite a bit of it. One idea I have was inspired by Bob Sutherland, owner of Cherry Republic. Bob started charging a 1% voluntary, refundable "tax" on all sales, which he then contributes to farm and land preservation funds. Over the last few years, he has contributed over $400,000 through these efforts. Could we do something like this, but community wide? Think about how little 1% of your lunch bill would be. Maybe 7 cents? Now, over the course of a year, 1% of sales at a restaurant might add up to be very significant. Obviously, not everyone would care to participate, but imagine if 50 or 100 businesses agreed to try it out for a year. The only cost to the business owner would be bookkeeping/collecting, which would be a generous donation to the fund in and of itself.

What do you think? Any ideas or suggestions or offers to help?

4 comments:

tylerdurdan said...

Megan, I want you to know that many people in this district have asked the same questions about our poor leadership. The rational that you offer in this blog is refreshing and right on time! I wish you the best in your endeavor to become a school board member. I assure you that many people you dont even know are throwing their support at you. Dr. Dean and Dr. Mohr should be a little uncomfortable if you ask me.

james said...

I like it Megan, you are thinking at this problem from a new angle. I am not sure what your participation rate would be but I like the concept. I just can not swallow another millage increase in Traverse City while all of the surrounding districts continue to be more inviting to residents due to the low tax rates. Leveraging taxes against the entire citizenship when a good portion are paying to send their children to competing schools or have no children at all, does not seem appropriate.

james said...

Congrats Megan! Now you will have the opportunity to influence all of these very important issues. I will stay tuned as things progress. I am happy to say that I did vote for you because of your fresh perspectives. Keep up the good work!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.